Volume 18, Issue 1 (1-2026)
jorar 2026, 18(1): 45-56 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Puladi N, Vakil A. The Role of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies in Facilitating Humanitarian Access during Disasters. jorar 2026; 18 (1) :45-56
URL: http://jorar.ir/article-1-1056-en.html
URL: http://jorar.ir/article-1-1056-en.html
Professor of International Law, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (549 Views)
INTRODUCTION: Access to humanitarian assistance is a fundamental right during disasters and emergencies. The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) plays a pivotal role in ensuring this access through both legal frameworks and operational mechanisms. This study examines how the IFRC bridges the gap between international humanitarian norms and field-level implementation to facilitate effective disaster response.
METHODS: This descriptive-analytical study employed content and document analysis. Data were synthesized from international legal instruments, IFRC policy documents, operational reports (2019–2024), and UN resolutions.
FINDINGS: The IFRC employs a dual-pronged integrated strategy grounded in institutional legal theory and crisis management frameworks. First, regarding normative development, the IFRC has been instrumental in advancing the International Disaster Response Law (IDRL) guidelines, influencing the International Law Commission's (ILC) Draft Articles on the Protection of Persons in the Event of Disasters (2016), and advocating for their evolution into a binding treaty by 2027. Second, in terms of operational implementation, the IFRC has developed innovative solutions for complex crises, including armed conflicts (Ukraine, 2022–2023), governance crises (Haiti, 2022), and sanctions-affected contexts (Afghanistan, 2021–2024). Comparative analysis highlights the IFRC's distinctive strengths relative to other humanitarian organizations while identifying persistent implementation challenges.
CONCLUSION: The IFRC has established a comprehensive legal-operational framework that strengthens humanitarian access at normative, institutional, and operational levels. However, sustained effectiveness necessitates continued political commitment from states, enhanced accountability mechanisms, and predictable funding. The ongoing development of a binding treaty on disaster protection presents a critical opportunity to institutionalize these frameworks globally. For National Societies—particularly those operating in complex political and sanctions-affected environments—this framework provides essential guidance for ensuring humanitarian access while adhering to both international obligations and national legal frameworks.
METHODS: This descriptive-analytical study employed content and document analysis. Data were synthesized from international legal instruments, IFRC policy documents, operational reports (2019–2024), and UN resolutions.
FINDINGS: The IFRC employs a dual-pronged integrated strategy grounded in institutional legal theory and crisis management frameworks. First, regarding normative development, the IFRC has been instrumental in advancing the International Disaster Response Law (IDRL) guidelines, influencing the International Law Commission's (ILC) Draft Articles on the Protection of Persons in the Event of Disasters (2016), and advocating for their evolution into a binding treaty by 2027. Second, in terms of operational implementation, the IFRC has developed innovative solutions for complex crises, including armed conflicts (Ukraine, 2022–2023), governance crises (Haiti, 2022), and sanctions-affected contexts (Afghanistan, 2021–2024). Comparative analysis highlights the IFRC's distinctive strengths relative to other humanitarian organizations while identifying persistent implementation challenges.
CONCLUSION: The IFRC has established a comprehensive legal-operational framework that strengthens humanitarian access at normative, institutional, and operational levels. However, sustained effectiveness necessitates continued political commitment from states, enhanced accountability mechanisms, and predictable funding. The ongoing development of a binding treaty on disaster protection presents a critical opportunity to institutionalize these frameworks globally. For National Societies—particularly those operating in complex political and sanctions-affected environments—this framework provides essential guidance for ensuring humanitarian access while adhering to both international obligations and national legal frameworks.
Keywords: IFRC, Humanitarian access, Human rights, International Disaster Response Law (IDRL), Disaster relief, Legal-operational framework, Early action.
Article Type: Research article |
Subject:
Humanitarian laws
References
1. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Guidelines for the domestic facilitation and regulation of international disaster relief and initial recovery assistance (IDRL guidelines). Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; 2007.
2. International Law Commission. Draft articles on the protection of persons in the event of disasters. In: Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its sixty-eighth session. A/71/10. New York: United Nations; 2016. [DOI:10.18356/d4db21b6-en]
3. United Nations General Assembly. Resolution 79/128: protection of persons in the event of disasters. A/RES/79/128. New York: United Nations; 2024.
4. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Ukraine: one year on report. Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; 2023.
5. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Haiti: complex emergency appeal. Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; 2022.
6. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Afghanistan: annual report 2024. Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; 2024.
7. Zariei A, Raisi Dezaki L, Poorkhaghan Shahrezaei Z. Achieving good governance in the IFRC emphasizing the role of integrity in rescue & relief. Sci J Rescue Relief. 2025;17(3):184-194. [DOI:10.61882/jorar.17.3.6]
8. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Global funding gap report 2024. Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; 2024.
9. United Nations. Universal declaration of human rights. General Assembly resolution 217 A. Paris: United Nations; 1948.
10. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Strategy 2030. Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; 2020.
11. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Pakistan floods: emergency appeal final report. Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; 2023.
12. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Key messages: treaty on the protection of persons in the event of disasters. Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; 2025.
13. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Development of a basic package of solutions (based on lessons learnt and good practices) to enable IFRC network to handle challenges in countries with exceptional situations (draft proposal). Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; 2023.
14. African :union:. African charter on democracy, elections and governance. Addis Ababa: African :union:; 2007.
15. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Education strategic framework 2020–2030. Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; 2020.
16. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Policy on the protection of integrity of national societies and organs of the international federation. Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; 2018.
17. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Code of conduct for the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and non-governmental organizations in disaster relief. Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; 1994.
18. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Bangladesh: early action protocol report for floods. Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; 2023.
19. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Global humanitarian overview 2024. New York: United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs; 2024.
20. United Nations Economic and Social Council. Call to action under the authority of the Vice-President responsible for ECOSOC humanitarian affairs segment. New York: United Nations Economic and Social Council; 2025.
21. Mayring P. Qualitative content analysis: theoretical background and procedures. In: Bikner-Ahsbahs A, Knipping C, Presmeg N, editors. Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education: examples of methodology and methods. Cham: Springer; 2015: 365-380. [DOI:10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_13]
22. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Cash and voucher assistance programming: best practices guide. Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; 2022.
23. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Forecast-based financing: a new approach to disaster risk reduction. Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; 2020.
24. International Committee of the Red Cross. The auxiliary role of National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies: a legal perspective. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross; 2016.
25. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. COVID-19: global response and recovery operations update. Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; 2022.
26. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Terms of reference: office of internal audit and investigations. Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; 2019.
27. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Global trends: forced displacement and humanitarian access. New York: United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs; 2024.
28. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Disaster law programme: building resilient communities through legal preparedness. Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; 2021.
29. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate change 2023: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the sixth assessment report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2023. [DOI:10.1017/9781009325844]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
