Volume 10, Issue 3 (10-2018)                   jorar 2018, 10(3): 50-60 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mortazavi S K, Sharifara H. A Reflection on Resilience in Disasters; the application of Thomas A Spragens’ methodology. jorar. 2018; 10 (3) :50-60
URL: http://jorar.ir/article-1-541-en.html
Faculty Member, Political Science Department, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (1266 Views)
Reducing vulnerabilities and enhancing capacities of communities to cope with disasters could be regarded as a new model in the disaster management approach. It changes traditional passive disaster response into an active resilience-based action. This new understanding can be considered as a way of treatment to get out of the critical traditional relief assistance as well as its challenges and bottlenecks. What is resilience and how to exploit Thomas A Spragens’ four-stage methodology of crisis theory, as theoretical justification of resilience, are two questions that the present study seeks to provide response to. The findings revealed that using Spragnes’ model including observation of disorder, diagnosis, reconstructing the polis, and prescription, the resilience process can be reconsidered in the field of disaster management, in order to present a comprehensive and systematized image of its role in the novel and resilience-based disaster management to the audience by putting it into the theoretical perspective.
Full-Text [PDF 305 kb]   (876 Downloads)    
Short Reports or Letters: Short Reports | Subject: حقوق بشردوستانه

1. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction [Online]. [cited 2015]; Available from: URL: https://www.unisdr.org/we/coordinate/sendai-framework
2. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Yokohama strategy and plan of action for a safer world: Guidelines for natural disaster prevention, preparedness and mitigation. Proceedings of the World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction; 1994 May 23-27; Yokohama, Japan.
3. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. World disasters report. Geneva, Switzerland: IFRC; 2000.
4. Spragens TA. Understanding political theory. Trans. Rajaee F. Tehran, Iran: Agah Publications; 2015. [In Persian]
5. Sharifara H. A linguistic approach to the literature of crisis management. Tehran, Iran: Arvij Publications; 2014. [In Persian]
6. Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety 2003; 18(2): 76-82. [DOI:10.1002/da.10113]
7. Van Niekerk D. From disaster relief to disaster risk reduction: A consideration of the evolving international relief mechanism. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa 2008; 4(2): 355-76. [DOI:10.4102/td.v4i2.158]
8. Holling CS. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1973; 4: 1-23. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245]
9. Mitchell T, Harris K. Resilience: A risk management approach [Online]. [cited 2012]; Available from: URL:
10. https://www.crhnet.ca/sites/default/files/library/Mitchell.Harris.2012.Resilience.Risk%20management%20approach.pdf
11. Ashdown L. Humanitarian emergency response review [Online]. [cited 2011]; Available from: URL: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/67579/HERR.pdf
12. Carlson JL, Haffenden RA, Bassett GW, Buehring WA, Collins MJ, Folga SM, et al. Resilience: Theory and application. Argonne, IL: Argonne National Lab; 2012. [DOI:10.2172/1044521]
13. Mortazavi NS, Yarolahi N. Meta-analysis of the relationship between resilience and mental health. J Fundam Ment Health 2015; 17(3): 103-8. [In Persian]
14. Rutter M. Resilience concepts and findings: Implications for family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy 1999; 21(2): 119-44. [DOI:10.1111/1467-6427.00108]
15. Ghasem M, Hosseinchari M. Psychological resilience and intrinsic-extrinsic motivation: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Developmental Psychology 2012; 9(33): 61-71. [In Persian]
16. Delake H, Samare Mohsen Beigi H, Shahivandi A. Evaluation of social resilience in urban areas of Isfahan. Journal of Sociology of Social Institutions 2017; 4(9): 227-52. [In Persian]
17. Mashayekhi M. Social resilience is more important than healthy air. Etemad newspaper. 2017 Nov 26: 13.
18. Cutter SL, Burton CG, Emrich CT. Disaster Resilience Indicators for Benchmarking Baseline Conditions. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 2010; 7(1):51. [DOI:10.2202/1547-7355.1732]
19. McManus S. Resilience management: A framework for assessing and improving the resilience of organizations. Bangkok, Thailand: Bangkok Publishing Residence; 2007.
20. Hartog J. Disaster resilience in an ageing world: How to make policies and programmes inclusive of older people. London, UK: Help Age International; 2014.
21. Department for International Development. Defining disaster resilience: A DFID approach paper. London, UK: DFID; 2011.
22. Almedom AM, Tumwine JK. Resilience to disasters: A paradigm shift from vulnerability to strength. Afr Health Sci 2008; 8(Suppl 1): S1-S4.
23. Haghighat SS, Hejazi SH. A critical approach to the application of Spragens crisis theory in political studies. Political Science 2010; 13(1): 187.
24. [In Persian]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | http://www.journalsystem.ir/demo5

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb