Volume 17, Issue 2 (4-2025)
jorar 2025, 17(2): 116-127 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sibevei A, Ebrahimi S, Khazaei M. Addressing Barriers to Open Data Networks in Healthcare: A Systems Approach to Pandemic Response. jorar 2025; 17 (2) :116-127
URL: http://jorar.ir/article-1-1019-en.html
URL: http://jorar.ir/article-1-1019-en.html
Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Torbat Heydarieh, Razavi Khorasan, Iran
Abstract: (379 Views)
INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed major shortcomings in healthcare data systems worldwide, particularly the need for accessible and transparent data sharing. In Iran, these shortcomings were particularly visible due to the lack of a structured open data network in the healthcare sector. Hence, this study addresses the barriers to open data networks in healthcare.
METHODS: This study used Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) supported by MICMAC analysis to examine and prioritize barriers to the establishment and use of open data platforms in the Iranian healthcare system. Data were collected through expert consultations with eight experts in the field of health information and policy.
FINDINGS: The analysis revealed significant barriers to implementation, including lack of government coordination, high startup costs, and inadequate technology infrastructure. For use, the most prominent barriers included the lack of data standards, poor data management, and uncontrolled growth of unstructured data. Many of these barriers were interrelated, and some acted as root causes that hindered systemic progress.
CONCLUSION: Addressing these challenges requires coordinated strategic efforts focused on increasing ICT competencies, upgrading infrastructure, and strengthening institutional support. Establishing a functional open data network is essential to improve public health outcomes and enable faster responses to future health crises in Iran.
METHODS: This study used Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) supported by MICMAC analysis to examine and prioritize barriers to the establishment and use of open data platforms in the Iranian healthcare system. Data were collected through expert consultations with eight experts in the field of health information and policy.
FINDINGS: The analysis revealed significant barriers to implementation, including lack of government coordination, high startup costs, and inadequate technology infrastructure. For use, the most prominent barriers included the lack of data standards, poor data management, and uncontrolled growth of unstructured data. Many of these barriers were interrelated, and some acted as root causes that hindered systemic progress.
CONCLUSION: Addressing these challenges requires coordinated strategic efforts focused on increasing ICT competencies, upgrading infrastructure, and strengthening institutional support. Establishing a functional open data network is essential to improve public health outcomes and enable faster responses to future health crises in Iran.
Keywords: Open data, Interpretive Structural Modeling, Healthcare systems, Covid-19, Coronavirus pandemic.
Article Type: Research article |
Subject:
Epidemic in Crisis
References
1. Moynihan R, Sanders S, Michaleff ZA, Scott AM, Clark J, To EJ, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilization of healthcare services: a systematic review. BMJ open. 2021;11(3):e045343 [DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045343]
2. Yaqoob I, Salah K, Jayaraman R, Al-Hammadi Y. Blockchain for healthcare data management: opportunities, challenges, and future recommendations. Neural Computing and Applications. 2022: 34(14): 11475-1149 [DOI:10.1007/s00521-020-5519-w]
3. Antunes RS, André da Costa C, Küderle A, Yari IA, Eskofier B. Federated learning for healthcare: Systematic review and architecture proposal. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST). 2022;13(4):1-23 [DOI:10.1145/3501813]
4. Al‐Metwali BZ, Al‐Jumaili AA, Al‐Alag ZA, Sorofman B. Exploring the acceptance of COVID‐19 vaccine among healthcare workers and general population using health belief model. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice. 2021;27(5):1112-22 [DOI:10.1111/jep.13581]
5. Krishnamoorthi R, Joshi S, Almarzouki HZ, Shukla PK, Rizwan A, Kalpana C, et al. A novel diabetes healthcare disease prediction framework using machine learning techniques. Journal of Healthcare Engineering. 2022 [DOI:10.1155/2022/1684017]
6. Tayefi M, Ngo P, Chomutare T, Dalianis H, Salvi E, Budrionis A, et al. Challenges and opportunities beyond structured data in analysis of electronic health records. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics. 2021;13(6):e1549 [DOI:10.1002/wics.1549]
7. Tagde P, Tagde S, Bhattacharya T, Tagde P, Chopra H, Akter R, et al. Blockchain and artificial intelligence technology in e-Health. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021;28:52810-31 [DOI:10.1007/s11356-021-16223-0]
8. Rayens E, Norris KA. Prevalence and healthcare burden of fungal infections in the United States, 2018. Open forum infectious diseases; 2022: Oxford University Press US. [DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofab593]
9. Yehudi Y, Hughes-Noehrer L, Goble C, Jay C. COVID-19: An exploration of consecutive systemic barriers to pathogen-related data sharing during a pandemic. Data & Policy. 2025;7:e4 [DOI:10.1017/dap.2024.79]
10. Santos S, Humbard M, Lambrou AS, Lin G, Padilla Y, Chaitram J, et al. The SARS-CoV-2 test scale-up in the USA: an analysis of the number of tests produced and used over time and their modelled impact on the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet Public Health. 2025;10(1):e47-e57 [DOI:10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00279-2]
11. Copeland KA, Amsterdam A, Gerker H, Bennett D, Ladipo J, King A. Why is ECE enrollment so complicated? An analysis of barriers and co-created solutions from the frontlines. Early Childhood Research Quarterly. 2025;71:12-25 [DOI:10.1016/j.ecresq.2024.11.007]
12. Guan A, Cruz T, Sowell J, Mattias B, Shah A, Hassberg AH, et al. Combining mixed methods and community-based participatory research approaches to identify neighborhood-level needs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2025;19(1):103-17 [DOI:10.1177/15586898231222037]
13. Mian ND, Glutting JH. Leaks in the workforce pipeline: Understanding barriers to pursuing mental health careers among undergraduate psychology students. Teaching of Psychology. 2025;52(1):59-68 [DOI:10.1177/00986283221141370]
14. United Nations. Guidelines on open government data for citizen engagement. Department of Economic and Social Affairs: Division for Public Administration and Development Management United Nation: New York; 2013 [Internet] . Available from: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3907402/files/OpenGovtData.pdf
15. Principles open government Data. 2016 [Internet] Available from: https:// public.resource.org/8_principles.html.
16. Gurin J. Open Data Now: The Secret to Hot Startups. Smart Investing, Savvy Marketing, and Fast Innovation-January. 2014;7:2014.
17. Zuiderwijk A, Janssen M, editors. The negative effects of open government data-investigating the dark side of open data. Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research; 2014. [DOI:10.1145/2612733.2612761]
18. Zuiderwijk A, Janssen M, editors. A coordination theory perspective to improve the use of open data in policy-making. International Conference on Electronic Government; 2013: Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-40358-34]
19. Ubaldi B. Open government data: Towards empirical analysis of open government data initiatives. 2013 [DOI:10.1787/5k46bj4f03s7-en]
20. Schubart JR, Einbinder JS. Evaluation of a data warehouse in an academic health sciences center. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2000;60(3):319-33 [DOI:10.1016/S1386-5056(00)00126-X]
21. Khan SI, Latiful Hoque AS. Development of national health data warehouse for data mining. Database Systems Journal. 2015;6(1):3-13
22. Choi IY, Park S, Park B, Chung BH, Kim C-S, Lee HM, et al. Development of prostate cancer research database with the clinical data warehouse technology for direct linkage with electronic medical record system. Prostate international. 2013;1(2):59-64 [DOI:10.12954/PI.12015]
23. Ayatollahi H, Mirani N, Haghani H. Electronic health records: what are the most important barriers? Perspectives in Health Information Management. 2014;11:1c.
24. Gupta P, Mehra R. Modeling drivers of machine learning in health care using interpretive structural modeling approach. Modeling, Simulation and Optimization: Springer; 2021:453-64 [DOI:10.1007/978-981-15-9829-6_35]
25. Abdolhossenzadeh M, Sanayi M, Zolfagharzadeh SM. The concept of open Government data policy and explain the advantages and benefits of the different policy fields. Strategic Studies of public policy. 2017;7(22):55-74.
26. Xu C, Chen Y, Dai J. Open government data and resource allocation efficiency: evidence from China. Applied Economics. 2025;57(22):2887-904. [DOI:10.1080/00036846.2024.2331430]
27. Alamo T, Reina DG, Mammarella M, Abella A. Open data resources for fighting covid-19. arXiv preprint arXiv:200406111. 2020 [DOI:10.3390/electronics9050827]
28. Reichman OJ, Jones MB, Schildhauer MP. Challenges and opportunities of open data in ecology. Science. 2011;331(6018):703-5 [DOI:10.1126/science.1197962]
29. Keen J, Calinescu R, Paige R, Rooksby J. Big data+ politics= open data: the case of health care data in England. Policy & Internet. 2013;5(2):228-43 [DOI:10.1002/1944-2866.POI330]
30. Hartung C, Lerer A, Anokwa Y, Tseng C, Brunette W, Borriello G, editors. Open data kit: tools to build information services for developing regions. Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development; 2010. [DOI:10.1145/2369220.2369236]
31. Asadi F, Mastaneh Z. [Challenges of using information technology in hospitals affiliated to Shaheed Beheshti University of medical sciences, 2009(In Persian)]. Iranian Journal Of Surgery. 2012;20(1) Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/408099/en
32. Sivarajah U, Kamal MM, Irani Z, Weerakkody V. Critical analysis of Big Data challenges and analytical methods. Journal of Business Research. 2017;70:263-86 [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.001]
33. Alamo T, Reina DG, Mammarella M, Abella A. Covid-19: Open-Data Resources for Monitoring, Modeling, and Forecasting the Epidemic. Electronics. 2020;9(5):827 [DOI:10.3390/electronics9050827]
34. Zuiderwijk A, Janssen M, Choenni S, Meijer R. Design principles for improving the process of publishing open data. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy. 2014 [DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-40358-3_4]
35. Armbrust M, Fox A, Griffith R, Joseph AD, Katz R, Konwinski A, et al. A view of cloud computing. Communications of the ACM. 2010;53(4):50-8 [DOI:10.1145/1721654.1721672]
36. Patil DJ. Building data science teams: the skills, tools and perspectives behind great science groups. O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2011
37. Goldbaum S, Mihaly A, Ellison T, Barr ET, Marron M. High Assurance Software for Financial Regulation and Business Platforms. International Conference on Verification, Model Checking, and Abstract Interpretation; Springer. 2022. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-94583-16]
38. Kushnir N, Yatskevich E, Trishkin E, Bobina N. Cloud storage and information protection. The Scientific Heritage. 2022; 83:59-61.
39. Gholian-Jouybari F, Khazaei M, Saen RF, Kia R, Bonakdari H, Hajiaghaei-Keshteli M, et al. Developing environmental, social and governance (ESG) strategies on evaluation of municipal waste disposal centers: A case of Mexico. Chemosphere. 2024;364:142961 [DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142961]
40. Khazaei M, Gholian-Jouybari F, Davari Dolatabadi M, Pourebrahimi Alamdari A, et al. Renewable energy portfolio in Mexico for Industry 5.0 and SDGs: Hydrogen, wind, or solar? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Elsevier, 2025;213:115420 [DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2025.115420]
41. Ghaedi M, Foukolaei PZ, Asari FA, Khazaei M, Gholian-Jouybari F, Hajiaghaei-Keshteli M. Pricing electricity from blue hydrogen to mitigate the energy rebound effect: A case study in agriculture and livestock. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2024;84:993-1003 [DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.08.241]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
