Volume 11, Issue 2 (12-2019)                   jorar 2019, 11(2): 129-137 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mobaraki O, Aminpour R. The evalution of city vulnerability with the passive deffence approach (Case Study: Mahabad city). jorar. 2019; 11 (2) :129-137
URL: http://jorar.ir/article-1-383-en.html
Department of Geography and Urban Planning, School of Humanities, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran
Abstract:   (1063 Views)
INTRODUCTION: Nowadays, due to population growth and resource constraints, cities are more vulnerable towards the crisis. Reducing the vulnerability of urban land use, with utilizing new approaches of crisis management such as passive defense, can be useful in creating a secure environment in cities. This is of the most important goals, planners and city managers are going to implement in cities; and how to deal with natural disasters, is of the major concerns of societies. This study aimed to evaluate city vulnerability in Mahabad City, Iran, based on the passive defense approach.
METHODS: In this applied descriptive-analytical research, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model was used to analyze the data, and Geographic Information System (GIS) software was used to draw the maps. Then, to clarify the positive and negative features, or the opportunities and the threats, the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) technique was applied.
FINDINGS: Based on the AHP model, the highest records were given to vital factors such as networks, fuel storage, water, and electricity, while the lowest records were given to higher education centers. Moreover, based on the SWOT analysis, the most important weaknesses of Mahabad City were as the compact and dense texture of the city, the low width of the most of the passageways, and the aggregation of major activities in the city center.
CONCLUSION: Research results show that in Mahabad City, there is no comprehensive plan to secure citizens. Urban planning by relevant institutions and administrative councils does not fit the physical and human components of the city.
Full-Text [PDF 1278 kb]   (651 Downloads)    
Short Reports or Letters: Research Article | Subject: اپیدمی در بحران ها

References
1. Movahedi Nia J. Principles of active defense. Tehran, Iran: Malek-Ashtar University of Technology; 2014. p. 74. [In Persian].
2. Ziyari K. Urban land use planning. Yazd, Iran: Yazd University Publications; 2002. [In Persian].
3. Kamran H, Hosseini Amini H. Position analysis of Shahriar official city based on passive defense principles. Geography and Environmental Planning. 2012; 23(3): 163-76. [In Persian].
4. Parizadi T, Hosseini Amini H, Shahriari M. Passive defense arrangement analysis of Saqqez city in the approach. Urban Management 2011; 8(26): 191-206. [In Persian].
5. Hajikazemi F, Abdohallahzadeh A. Prioritizing metro stations as underground shelters based on the passive defense considerations (Case Study: 6 Central Stations of Line 1 and 2 of Tabriz Metro). Passive Defense Quarterly 2020; 9(3): 35-46. [In Persian].
6. Ismaili Shahdakht M. Urban dissertation with ineffective passive defense approach (Case Study: Birjand City) [MSc Thesis]. Tehran, Iran: Department of Geography, Tarbiat Modares University; 2010. [In Persian].
7. DavisY. Architecture and planning restructuring, Trans. Fallahi AR. Tehran, Iran: Shahid Beheshti University Publications; 2006.
8. Hosseini Amini H, Asadi S, Bornafar M. Evaluation of the structure Langroud city for passive defense planning. Journal of Geographical Sciences: 2010; 15(18): 129-49. [In Persian].
9. Hearoscar J. Income based on urban planning basics, Trans. Soleimani M, Yekanifar AR. Tehran, Iran: Kharazmi Publications; 1997. [In Persian].
10. Zargar A, Mesgari S. Inactive architectural defense (Strategies for Reducing Resilience Risk). Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Integrated Natural Disaster Management; 2008 Feb. 15-16; Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].
11. Jahandideh-Rahdaneh M, Maghferatkhah J. Evaluation of the frontier towns' vulnerability with the passive defense approach (Case Study of Piranshahr), Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Engineering; 1 Dec. 2015; Dubai, UAE.
12. Ahmarlouei-Heris MH. Passive defense in modern wars. Tehran, Iran: Farabi Publications; 2015.
13. [In Persian].
14. Moayyedinejad H, Haghi Abi AH, Jalili S. Deficiencies and weaknesses in crisis management in Iran's vital arteries. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Integrated Natural Disaster Management; 2008 Feb. 15-16; Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].
15. Ziraki MR, Saadati H. Passive defense approach in the spatial zoning of temporary accommodation camps using the method of compilation (AHP-FUZZY, GIS) (a Case Study: Region 8 in Tehran). Passive Defense Quarterly 2020; 9(3): 77-86. [In Persian].
16. Ashworth G. Urban from and defense functions of cities. In: Bremond M, Riley R, Editors. The geography of defense. London, UK: Croom Helm; 1987.
17. Mohammadpour A, Zarghami AH, Zarghami S. Investigation, and evaluation of vulnerable zones and elements of the city from the passive defense view case study: City of Sanandaj. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Geographical Data 2017; 26(102): 175-90. [In Persian].
18. Mesgari Hoshyar S, Haji Ibrahim A. Non-defense in architecture, risk reduction strategy in the face of disaster," 3rd International Conference on comprehensive management of non-natural dark horse events, 2008. [In Persian]. https://www.civilica.com/Paper-INDM03_149.html
19. Mirabadi M, Rajabi A, Mahdavi Hajilouie M. An analysis on spatial heterogeneous in urban areas with emphasis on the rule of the poor and low level tissues and settlements (case study: The city of Mahabad). Journal of Geography Space 2016; 16(55): 17-43. [In Persian].
20. Asgharian-Jeddi A. Architectural requirements for sustainable non-defensive defense. Tehran, Iran: Shahid Beheshti University Publications; 2009.
21. [In Persian].
22. Bowen W. AHP: Multiple criteria evaluation. In: Klosterman RE, Brail RK, Bossard EG, Editors. Spreadsheet models for urban and regional analysis. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research; 1993.
23. Qudsipour H. AHP analytical hierarchy process. Tehran, Iran: Amirkabir University of Technology Publications; 2011. [In Persian].
24. Shahsavari H, Ghorbani V, Rabiei B. Effect of self- classification of urban areas on approach to passive defense, "International journal of urban and rural management, No.38, 2015 [In Persian]. http://ijurm.imo.org.ir/browse.php?a_id=440&sid=1&slc_lang=fa
25. Kameli M, Hoseini H, Salmi A Hoseini B. Requirements of Passive defense in metro station with using the Delphi technique, Journal of Urban Research and Planning, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht Branch, No 28, 2017, [In Persian]. http://jupm.miau.ac.ir/article_2335.html
26. Comprehensive Plan of Mahabad city performed by Pouya Consulting Engineers.2009.
27. Farzamshad M. Theoretical foundations of architecture in defective defense. Tehran, Iran: Jam E Jam Publisher; 2007. [In Persian].
28. Hekmatnia H, Mousavi MN. The application of model in geography with the emphasis on urban and regional planning. Yazd, Iran: Elm-e-Novin Publication; 2006. p. 129. [In Persian].

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | http://www.journalsystem.ir/demo5

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb