Volume 15, Issue 4 (10-2023)
jorar 2023, 15(4): 245-254 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Jalali Nejad S, Damirchili F, Davoudi R. Strategies and Obstacles Facing the Relief and Rescue Organization in Benefiting from Education in the Age of Knowledge. jorar 2023; 15 (4) :245-254
URL: http://jorar.ir/article-1-892-en.html
URL: http://jorar.ir/article-1-892-en.html
Department of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Khodabande Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khodabande, Iran
Abstract: (970 Views)
INTRODUCTION: The current research aimed to analyze the strategies, platforms, and obstacles facing the Relief and Rescue Organization in benefiting from education in the age of knowledge.
METHODS: This applied qualitative research was conducted based on the grounded theory. Participants included academic and Relief and Rescue Organization experts. A total of 20 cases were studied and selected by purposive non-random sampling using semi-structured interviews and theoretical saturation principle. In the theory analysis process, MAXQDA-2022 software was used.
FINDINGS: Based on the research findings, managerial factors, as well as technological and behavioral development, were identified as strategies. Moreover, platforms were behavioral, environmental, and social factors and obstacles were recognized as technological education and support.
CONCLUSION: As evidenced by the obtained results, in order to improve its quality level in the age of knowledge, Relief and Rescue Organization should establish a close relationship with education sector and remove the obstacles ahead.
METHODS: This applied qualitative research was conducted based on the grounded theory. Participants included academic and Relief and Rescue Organization experts. A total of 20 cases were studied and selected by purposive non-random sampling using semi-structured interviews and theoretical saturation principle. In the theory analysis process, MAXQDA-2022 software was used.
FINDINGS: Based on the research findings, managerial factors, as well as technological and behavioral development, were identified as strategies. Moreover, platforms were behavioral, environmental, and social factors and obstacles were recognized as technological education and support.
CONCLUSION: As evidenced by the obtained results, in order to improve its quality level in the age of knowledge, Relief and Rescue Organization should establish a close relationship with education sector and remove the obstacles ahead.
Article Type: Research article |
Subject:
New educational methods in the management of crisis and disasters
References
1. Soleimani N, Nikourosh A, Mehrpour M. Educational policy making in the age of knowledge, the first scientific research conference on new findings of Iranian management, entrepreneurship and education sciences, Tehran, 2014. (In Persian)
2. Leo E. Toward a contingent model of mirroring between product and organization: a knowledge management perspective. Journal of product innovation management 2020; 37(1): 97-117. [DOI:10.1111/jpim.12515]
3. Mosala Nejad, D. Research on central knowledge policy in the economic, social and cultural development programs of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Politics Quarterly. 2012; 42(4): 59-73. (In Persian)
4. Dos Santos LM. From industry professionals to secondary school teachers: the relationship between second career-changing teachers and social cognitive career theory. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. 2021; 10(5):150. [DOI:10.36941/ajis-2021-0130]
5. Veselá D, Klimová K. Knowledge-based economy vs. creative economy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 141: 413-17. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.072]
6. Khoundabi B, Molla Mohammad Alian Z, Mazbouhi S, Ghadiri M. Impact of Information and communication technology on self-directed learning among employees of the Tehran Red Crescent Society. Scientific Research Quarterly of Relief and Rescue. 2023; 15 (2): 96-103. (In Persian) [DOI:10.32592/jorar.2023.5.2.3]
7. Antunes HD, Pinheiro PG. Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2019; 5(2): 140-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.jik.2019.04.002]
8. Dekamini F, Javanmard H, Ehsani Far M. Designing a qualitative model of the critical conditions of COVID-19 in the homes of Halal Red Crescent community. Scientific Research Quarterly of Relief and Rescue. 2023; 15(2): 78-88. (In Persian) [DOI:10.32592/jorar.2023.15.2.1]
9. Hassanzadeh M. Effective digital transformation and the need for convergence between the fields involved in knowledge management. Science and techniques of information management. 2020; 6(2):7-16. (In Persian)
10. Chaharband F, Momeni F. Challenges & perspectives of knowledge-based development in Iran: a view from the perspective of basic education. Scientific Quarterly Journal of Economic Growth and Development Research. 2012; 1(4): 116-75. (In Persian)
11. Hosseinpour R, Sayandneghab Q. Designing a model for evaluating the effectiveness of training and educational courses of the military organization. Research in Islamic education issues. 2019; 44(27): 25-57. (In Persian)
12. Mahmoudian O, Heydari A, Mehrkam, M, Hashemi M. Formulation of a strategic model to investigate and analyze factors affecting the relationship between industry and university (Case study: Islamic Azad University units in Tehran). Culture in Islamic University, (2022). 42, 204-187. (In Persian)
13. Shafighiyan H, Ghorchian N, Bagheri M. Identifying the elements of the competency-based education system model with the foundation's data approach (case study: Ports and Maritime Organization, Shahid Rajaei Port). Training and development of human resources 2020; 26(7): 1-22. (In Persian)
14. Tari F, Dehghani M. Identifying the strengths and weaknesses of E-learning courses in human resource training at the National Iranian Gas Company. Human Resource Training and Development, 2019; 7(26): 100-123 (In Persian)
15. Sarati Shirazi M, Asareh F, Faraj Pahlo A. Examining the relationship between university-industry co-publishing and academic knowledge commercialization in the form of spin-offs in Iran. Scientific research paper, 2017; 3(2):135-46. (In Persian)
16. Nafea RM, Toplu EK. Future of Education in Industry 4. 0: Educational Digitization-A Canadian Case Study. In Research anthology on digital transformation, organizational change, and the impact of remote work. 2021; 1977-97. [DOI:10.4018/978-1-7998-7297-9.ch098]
17. Prichetnikov AV, Tishchenko IA, Fedorov IS. Investigation on the Application of Virtual Education for Engineering Students in the Energy Industry. In2020 International Multi-Conference on Industrial Engineering and Modern Technologies (FarEastCon) 2020: 1-5. [DOI:10.1109/FarEastCon50210.2020.9271451]
18. De Wit-de Vries E, Dolfsma WA, van der Windt HJ, Gerkema MP. Knowledge transfer in university-industry research partnerships: a review. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2019; 44:1236-55. [DOI:10.1007/s10961-018-9660-x]
19. Mantovani F. 12 VR learning: Potential and challenges for the use of 3d environments in education and training. Towards cyberpsychology: mind, cognition, and society in the Internet age. 2001; 2(207).
20. Manesh MF, Pellegrini MM, Marzi G, Dabic M. Knowledge management in the fourth industrial revolution: Mapping the literature and scoping future avenues. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2020; 68(1): 289-300. [DOI:10.1109/TEM.2019.2963489]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
